Skip to main content


You see statistics like these and begin to wonder what really is happening to the web? Is the dominance of the big guns such as Google, Microsoft, and others coming to an end?

Here are the six web properties with the most pages viewed (remember ads run is mostly equal to pages viewed on the web):

Yahoo! - 43,700MM
Time Warner - 31,600MM (AOL is roughly 70% of this)
Microsoft - 21,800MM (MSN is part of this)
eBay - 10,900MM
MySpace - 9,600MM
Google - 6,300MM

Notwithstanding the somewhat interesting fact that Google is a relatively small page view generator, which makes sense given their reliance on search, the shocking fact is how fast MySpace is catching up to the big guys.

And what's even more amazing is that MySpace's page views have grown 50% in the past three months.

My first experience of MySpace was quite some time ago, as we were browsing through (actually studying them inside out) all the social-networking sites, like Orkut, Friendster, and Wallop for the next killer-Social-Networking-platform we were to build. And honestly, my team, including me, did not have a very high opinion of MySpace . It seemed far less appealing, far less inviting, than some of the others we came across.

Then came the big news, Rupert Murdoch had bought MySpace as a part of his big Internet plans. Suddenly, my interest in it was rekindled. I had to dig out the lost account that I had created but not used for very long, and was back MySpacing. MySpace looked bigger, and more happening. It was quite mind boggling to see so much of activity around. For all the unusable features it threw at the user, it was astonishingly bustling with activity.

MySpacing had turned into a rage. While I could see the impact of Orkut in the campus gradually declining, in part due to the boredom creeping in, and in part because of academic obligations, with MySpace, it was totally different. MySpace was taking over the territory that was once dominated by the Instant Messengers. People found the idea of leaving a message in public domain, that was non transient, much more appealing than an easily forgotten casual IM chat. It sounded weird but it was the way it was. Some of the self-admitted MySpace freaks I came across were living a Myspaced life checking on each other's activities, leaving comments, posting weird pictures, making suggestive remarks and changing silly profile titles innumerous times a day! Baffling as it is, MySpace had emerged as a way of life: a really cool way of life!

And so, these stats do not surprise me! It may not be a direct threat to Google and Microsoft, for they are completely different paradigms in my opinion, but it is something big happening on the web currently.

It may not be completely wrong to say that MySpace actually turns out to be one of the best examples of Web 2.0, incorporating collaboration, information dissemination, networking and community participation, all without the hype of the AJAX.

(And just so you know, we did build what we had set out to. Only never got anyone to host it for us.)

Technorati Tags:

Update: Adam Lashinsky has published this story on Rupert's Web strategy:,15114,1117673,00.html.


Popular posts from this blog

Startups for a stronger Resume?

When the whole web is abuzz with keywords such as Ajax, Web 2.0, Meebo and all, there is some uncertainity about how this new Internet Bubble will shape up.

Mike at Techdirt writes that some of these new startups may be only to actually stand out for the crowd and act as a strong resume.

While the complaint is that so many of these companies are built to flip rather than to be sustainable businesses, some are noticing that this process is really just a better way for some to stand out and get a job. You build a company quickly and cheaply that gets some attention, and a bigger company comes along to scoop up your company, giving you a nice "signing bonus." In effect, the purpose of these companies is to act as a strong resume to stand out from the crowd.
Technorati Tags:


I'll have to admit that the nature of Pottermania is beyond my comprehension capabilities! As more and more fans of all ages and countries immerse themselves in Harry’s adventures, adding fuel to the belief that Pottermania is inescapable, I am purely and simply baffled by its ability to appeal to all ages.

Bored by the inactivity prevailing in this muggle world, I began to read the first one of the series and immediately concluded that reading beyond the tenth leaf was something impossible. Undeterred, I watched the first movie. I Hated it. But with the evil-wizard becoming apple of more and more eyes with every passing moment, around the world, it could only have been something wrong with me and so I watched the second movie. And then it became so easy to establish that I loathed the Potter Kid!

Just a passing thought - "Would it be a bad idea for a Potter special appearance in Oliver Twist? The poor kid could do with some wizardry."

Wimbledon - Swan Lake and Bartoli

OK. In the last few hours, I've been asked this question thrice and hence this post: Who am I rooting for in this Wimbledon? I no longer cheer for "Gentlemen's Tennis" these days. For it is unusually mundane and boring. FedEx and Nadal are way way ahead of anyone else that is clearly reflected in their rankings and hardly makes for any competition. Andy Roddick comes a distant third and this makes watching men's game a little less exciting when compared to the yesteryears of the men's game. The years that passed by had a different air to them, with the likes of Sampras, Agassi, Jim Courier, Goran Ivanisevic taking to the courts, the atmosphere that much more intense, the involvement all that much more. Plus as my friend Santosh says it- where are the serve and volley plays! (For all those jigging about on this stance of mine on FedEX and Tennis, I won't still buy your arguments about Schumi's dominance making F1 mundane though! F1 without Schumi is st…